Thursday, September 13, 2007

Some topic 2 reflections

The great thing about an on-line course such as this one, is that it gives you the flexibility to study and touch base around your other committments - and that has also proved to be one of the bad things. The last 2-3 weeks I have been flat out covering for sick colleagues, which has meant that the immediacy of that need overrode my study committments. Anyway I have managed to read through some of the resources for topic 2 and this is what I got out of it: 1. Getting my head around the jargon is still not easy. I think I understand what an 'institutional repository' is - but keep thinking of the schoolbook repository in Dallas where Lee Harvey Oswald was when he allegedly shot JFK. I need to read something 2-3 times to start feeling comfortable with all the e-techno talk. 2. When I was looking over the program for the e-research conference in Brisbane from June of this year, it was interesting to see how they 'streamed' their topics. I would have definitely been most interested in attending the Collaboration Environments - the Access and Data Management streams would not have been my 'thing'. I guess this tells me how I view the possibilities of e-research in terms of the potential to collaborate with other people from around the world. I was particularly interested in reading the abstract from Thorns and Allan on video conferencing and real life simulation - that sounded such an exciting concept. I know that Sophie, who is also doing this course, has made contact with the University of Manitoba to establish some forays into on-line collaboration with their staff and students doing dental hygiene. 3. Richard Levy's session on gateways to e-research was very informative (once I had read the PowerPoint 2-3 times to understand what a federated vs native database vs Google Scholar comparison was. It struck a chord with the approach to a simple research project that my students are currently undertaking. I think they have substituted the word 'research' with 'google'. They have needed to be guided onto other pathways of both e-research and more traditional methods. I think that Google has probably changed the way we access information permanently, but we need to see it as a tool, rather than the undisputed 'gospel'. I hope to never hear the gospel according to Google. Hope you are all finding time to keep up with the course. I have crossed off some time in semester break to google - oops - read and reflect some more.

3 comments:

sophiek said...

I have read the presentations as well Cathy and have the same reaction to them as well. Its interesting to note that there is so much techno terms to get the head around.. I am just getting a handle on some of the terminolgy. I tried accessing some federated searching sites with limited sucess, it seems as though you need some type of platform to be able to do this. As Rebecca mentioned on her site, I think the simple google scholar and simple Search Engine Math Commands do the trick! I have been dabbling with all these approaches to e-rsearch and have found lots of new articles on tobacco and dental hygienists. Why dont you try getting your teeth into it as well, by seraching dental therapists and tobacco using different search engine platforms and the simple engine math commands and see what happens!! I found a basic site really useful to help me get my head around searching at

http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2156021

I know this may sound very basic to the rest of our class, but I am a total novice and have found it very useful.

lets keep at it

Sophie

Rebecca Tooher said...

Great link Sophie. It kind of simplifies the searching that can be done in Medline and other databases and shows how to do it on Google or some other search engine. This is a great way of refining the search. The only thing I would say when it come to searching for research information is to be careful of using the subtraction feature (or the NOT command in Medline) as you can often loose a lot of things you actually would be interested in. You need to be really sure that the term is absolutely not related to your topic of interest.

Of course in Medline and EMBASE you can use the Medical Subject Headings (MESH) which are actually indexed to your topic and so make it much more likely you will find the stuff you are after (provided it has already been indexed).

Cathy S said...

I have read through Danny Sullivan's Search Engine Math - and as you say it is very user friendly.
Thanks for the tip
Cathy